The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in its second ruling on Wednesday upheld the argument by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC that it was wrong for the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, and its presidential candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar to raise criminal allegations of intimidation, harassment, corruption, and so forth against security personnel and some named persons, but who are not parties to the petition.
The Tribunal said the court lacked the powers to entertain any criminal allegations against any person, who is not before it.
The court then struck out the portions of the petition by Atiku and his party where such allegations are contained.
The Tribunal had earlier upheld Atiku and PDP contention that, issues of qualification and whether or not a candidate supplied false personal information to INEC before the election, could be heard before or after an election.
The court said questions about a candidate’s qualification could be heard by either a High Court or an election tribunal.
News2 days ago
Boko Haram: Former CP Tsav writes Nigerian editors over fake news, canvases support for Nigerian troops
Metro Plus2 days ago
Nigerian student get 13 years imprisonment for fraud
News1 day ago
The killing of Ropvil Daciya Dalep and NANS debased aluta-crazy
Sport2 days ago
Ighalo Linked With Loan Move To Manchester United
Breaking News2 days ago
JUST IN: Former commissioner jailed 19 years for stealing N19 million
Opinion2 days ago
When I Die (Death Notes)
Metro Plus19 hours ago
Houseboy Tries To ‘Wipe-Out’ Family With Sniper In Imo, Reveals It Is Third Failed Attempt (Video)
News23 hours ago
Again, DSS arrests journalist for allegedly publishing articles critising Buhari, Tinubu, others